momomuchu/make-no-mistakes

Stop trusting 'done'. Make AI coding agents prove their work — frozen specs, tamper-detected tests, an independent blind verifier, hard-blocking gates. Fails loudly instead of pretending. For Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode & any Agent Skills runtime. No unverified work passes.

Shell6 ★Developer Tools & CLIsGitHub ↗
Quality: solid 17/24
PAI: integrate 0.75
Appraised: 2026-07-29 current

Perfect health signals and solid docs offset by early-stage adoption (6 stars) and zero typed-language/dependency-manifest points.

Frozen specs, tamper-hashed tests, and an ed25519-signed manifest block agents from faking 'done'

Detects an agent weakening its own frozen test to fake a pass — halts with GAMING-DETECTED instead of retrying silently.

Contents

Overview

Verdict

Rating Summary
Quality solid (17/24) Strong health and documentation signals undercut by very early adoption and no typed-language/manifest engineering markers.
PAI Relevance integrate (0.75) Directly harvestable verification architecture that plugs cleanly into PAI's Skills/Hooks mechanism and fills a gap beyond the existing Evals skill.

Quality Assessment

17/24 — actively-maintained / adequately-documented / early-or-minimal

Health: 8/8 (actively-maintained)

Failed:

Passed:

Documentation: 6/8 (adequately-documented)

Failed:

Passed:

Engineering Signals: 3/8 (early-or-minimal)

Failed:

Passed:

PAI Relevance

Dimension Score Assessment
Harvest Value 2 Novel enforcement architecture — frozen specs, tamper-hashed tests, ed25519-signed manifest, independent blind verifier — directly applicable to PAI's Algorithm Verify phase and the Evals skill's design.
Integration Readiness 2 Distributed as Agent Skills (SKILL.md + shell hooks) with a one-command Claude Code plugin install; subprocess-executable, structured verdict output (DONE/STUCK/GAMING-DETECTED), matches PAI's CLI-first, skill/hook-based architecture.
Overlap Risk 1 Partially overlaps PAI's existing "Evals" skill (AI agent evaluation), though this repo's enforcement mechanics (tamper detection, independent verifier separation) go beyond what Evals currently covers.
Gap Fill 1 Addresses a functional area — hard-blocking proof-of-work enforcement against reward-hacking/gaming — where PAI's Evals skill has limited depth.

Composite: 0.75

What Next

Landscape Position

Category: Developer Tools & CLIs

In this category: cheat--cheat, casey--just, mvanhorn--cli-printing-press, openclaw--gogcli, simonw--showboat, gastownhall--beads, ohmyzsh--ohmyzsh, tirth8205--code-review-graph, tw93--Mole, mvanhorn--printing-press-library, mattpocock--skills, atomantic--slashdo

Standing: Distinct from the category's CLI-utility norm — most peers ship task runners or code-generation tools, while this is the first entry that positions itself as a verification-enforcement layer against agent reward-hacking.

Evidence Base

Density: 8/10 — README (partial, 8KB), release/star/fork/issue metadata, license, topics, and CI badge available; dependency manifest not available, full README (beyond 8KB) and commit history detail not confirmed.

Notes

Commit activity is concentrated in a 3-day burst (2026-07-02 to 2026-07-05) followed by 24 days of silence before appraisal — health probes pass on the letter of the rules, but the "actively-maintained" tag should be read with the caveat that development cadence has not been demonstrated over a longer window. Worth a re-check in a few months to confirm sustained maintenance beyond the initial release sprint.